01 / CAD
Digital Twin / CAD Baseline
- 12-coil stator reference
- Rotor and magnet architecture under study
- Fusion 360 as the current design source
KDP v1.0 Alpha
Validation Journey
KODEX M-001 evidence progression from CAD baseline through Explorer, validation review, bench protocol and prototype testing.
CADExplorerFableValidation EngineBench Protocol
KODEX M-001 Validation Journey
KODEX M-001 is being developed through a staged research methodology: CAD to Explorer to Validation Engine to Fable Review to Bench Protocol to Prototype Test. Each step narrows uncertainty before stronger technical claims are allowed.
02 / Explorer
Explorer
- Used for comparative candidate ranking
- RTI and EMF proxy are relative indicators only
- Not physical torque or efficiency values
03 / Validation Engine
Validation Engine
- Analytical plus geometry validation layer
- Ranks configurations under identical assumptions
- Outputs are explicitly dimensionless proxies
04 / Fable
Fable Review
- Independent AI-assisted review of technical documentation
- Helped identify wording issues, assumptions, and protocol gaps
- Reinforced separation of hypothesis, proxy ranking, FEM, and bench validation
05 / Bench Protocol
Bench Validation Protocol
- Compares 16P vs 20P using one shared 12-coil stator
- Uses open-circuit EMF and loaded output
- Decision rule: >1.10 confirms 20P; 0.94-1.06 prefers 16P; 1.06-1.10 repeats the matrix and decides by loaded metric
06 / Prototype
Next Step
- Physical prototype
- Controlled measurements
- FEM correlation
- Public technical report after validation
Current evidence boundary
Current results are exploratory and pre-validation. They do not prove anomalous energy gain. KODEX Research Labs uses staged evidence levels before making technical claims.
Evidence Level
KODEX M-001 is between L2 and L3, with bench validation protocol prepared.
L0 Idea
L1 Hypothesis
L2 Analytical Support
L3 Simulation Pending
L4 Prototype Pending
L5 Bench Validation Pending
L6 Independent Review Pending
Validation Module
FEM Campaign 01
CAD → Gmsh → Elmer → ParaView infrastructure validated
What this page is
A public research-status summary that explains how documentation review and computational validation connect to the prepared bench protocol.
What it is not
It is not a proof of device performance, anomalous energy gain, overunity, perpetual motion, or validated efficiency.
What comes next
Physical prototype testing under a controlled 16P vs 20P protocol, followed by FEM correlation and a public technical report after validation.